Productivity and Financial Analysis of Fishing Effort with Handline at Kutaraja Ocean Fishing Port Aceh Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31258/Keywords:
Payback Period, Kutaraja Ocean Fishing Port, Hand Line, ProductionAbstract
Production of catches on hand line-fishing gear at Kutaraja Ocean Fishing Port has decreased, this is clearly seen from the level of fish production produced, which was 2.407.580 tons in 2018 compared to production in 2019, which was 2,285,750 tons. The fishing business, which has become one of the livelihoods of the Indonesian people, is a little riskier compared to other businesses because the fish which are the main target of this business is always moving dynamically. The research objectives were to determine productivity per GT, Trip, and ABK on hand line-fishing gear and to determine the financial feasibility analysis of fishing effort on hand line-fishing gear at Kutaraja Ocean Fishing Port. The benefits of this research are to increase knowledge and insight regarding productivity and financial analysis of the fishing line effort. The method used in this study is a survey method. The data analysis method used in this research is a descriptive analysis method. The results showed that the value of productivity per trip with large-size ships has a high amount of production compared to smaller ship sizes. This is because a larger ship has a carrying capacity or more carrying capacity. Hand line fishing with a vessel size > 30 GT has a relatively long payback period, i.e. < 5 years. While ships with a size of 5 GT. 6 GTs. 9 GTs. 22 GTs. and 24 GT have a payback period of < 3 years. This is because a larger ship has a carrying capacity or more carrying capacity. Hand line fishing with a vessel size > 30 GT has a relatively long payback period, i.e. < 5 years. While ships with a size of 5 GT. 6 GTs. 9 GTs. 22 GTs. and 24 GT have a payback period of < 3 years. This is because a larger ship has a carrying capacity or more carrying capacity. Hand line fishing with a vessel size > 30 GT has a relatively long payback period, i.e. < 5 years. While ships with a size of 5 GT. 6 GTs. 9 GTs. 22 GTs. and 24 GT have a payback period of < 3 years.
Downloads
References
[KKP] Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. (2014). Laporan Kinerja KKP.
Fajri, I., Mustarrudin., & Baskoro, M.S. (2018). Pengaruh Faktor Teknis dan Lingkungan terhadap Kinerja Perikanan Purse Seine di Perairan Lampulo Provinsi Aceh. Albacore, 2(2): 135-144.
Inizianti, R.L. (2010). Analisis Spasial Daerah Penangkapan Ikan Kapal PSP 01 di Perairan Selatan Jawa Barat. Proposal. Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan. Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Jendris, I.R.M., Salam, A., & Baruadi, A.S. (2016). Analisis Finansial Usaha Perikanan Tangkap Pancing Ulur (HandLine) Pulau Dudepo Kecamatan Anggrek Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah Perikanan dan Kelautan, 4(3).
Kisworo, R., Saputra, S.W., & Ghofar, A. (2013). Analisis hasil tangkapan, produktivitas, dan kelayakan usaha perikanan rawai dasar di PPI Bajomulyo I Kabupaten Pati. Management of Aquatic Resources Journal (MAQUARES), 2(3): 190-196
Kurnia., Palo, M., & Jumsurizal. (2019). Produktivitas Pancing Ulur untuk Penangkapan Ikan Tenggiri (Scomberomorus commerson) di Perairan Pulau Tambelan Kepulauan Riau. Seminar Internasional/Nasional Industrilisasi Perikanan dan Kelautan Riau.
Pramudya, B. (2001). Ekonomi Teknik Bogor. Proyek Peningkatan Perguruan Tinggi. Institut Pesrtanian Bogor. Bogor.
Rahmat, E., & Thamrin, I. (2016). Teknologi Penangkapan Ikan Tuna dengan Alat Tangkap Pancing Ulur di Laut Banda oleh Nelayan Ambon (Provinsi Maluku). Buletin Teknik Litkayasa Sumber Daya dan Penangkapan, 14(1), 57-62.
Satrio, H.B. (2014). Determinan Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Industri Mebel pada Bagian Produksi di Kecamatan Kaliwates Kabupaten Jember. Skripsi. Universitas Jember. Jember.
